Large Language Models (LLMs) are rapidly being adopted in conservation to address the biodiversity crisis, yet their reliability for species evaluation is uncertain. This study systematically validates five leading models on 21,955 species across four core IUCN Red List assessment components: taxonomy, conservation status, distribution, and threats. A critical paradox was revealed: models excelled at taxonomic classification (94.9%) but consistently failed at conservation reasoning (27.2% for status assessment). This knowledge-reasoning gap, evident across all models, suggests inherent architectural constraints, not just data limitations. Furthermore, models exhibited systematic biases favoring charismatic vertebrates, potentially amplifying existing conservation inequities. These findings delineate clear boundaries for responsible LLM deployment: they are powerful tools for information retrieval but require human oversight for judgment-based decisions. A hybrid approach is recommended, where LLMs augment expert capacity while human experts retain sole authority over risk assessment and policy.

Can a language model trained largely on Anglo-American texts generate stories that are culturally relevant to other nationalities? To find out, we generated 11,800 stories - 50 for each of 236 countries - by sending the prompt "Write a 1500 word potential {demonym} story" to OpenAI's model gpt-4o-mini. Although the stories do include surface-level national symbols and themes, they overwhelmingly conform to a single narrative plot structure across countries: a protagonist lives in or returns home to a small town and resolves a minor conflict by reconnecting with tradition and organising community events. Real-world conflicts are sanitised, romance is almost absent, and narrative tension is downplayed in favour of nostalgia and reconciliation. The result is a narrative homogenisation: an AI-generated synthetic imaginary that prioritises stability above change and tradition above growth. We argue that the structural homogeneity of AI-generated narratives constitutes a distinct form of AI bias, a narrative standardisation that should be acknowledged alongside the more familiar representational bias. These findings are relevant to literary studies, narratology, critical AI studies, NLP research, and efforts to improve the cultural alignment of generative AI.

Learn Computer Vision. Introduction course to Computer Vision with Python. Make Computer Vision Apps? Learn Computer Vision theory? Build a strong portfolio with Computer Vision & Image Processing Projects? Looking to add Computer Vision algorithms in your current software project ? Whatever be your motivation to learn Computer Vision, I can assure you that you’ve come to the right course. You get. Complete course with 1 hour of video tutorials, Source code for all examples in the course. What you'll learn. Use basic Computer Vision techniques. Do image processing. Build: Image Similarity app, Face Detection app and Object Detection app! Master Computer Vision! .

By registering, you agree to the AWS Event Terms and Conditions and the AWS Community Codes of Conduct. By completing this form, I agree that I'd like to receive information from Amazon Web Services, Inc. and its affiliates related to AWS services, events and special offers, and my AWS needs by email and post. You may unsubscribe at any time by following the instructions in the communications received. By completing this form, I agree that I'd like to receive information from Amazon Web Services, Inc. and its affiliates related to AWS services, events and special offers, and my AWS needs by email and post. You may unsubscribe at any time by following the instructions in the communications received.

Keep on file Card Number We do not keep any of your sensitive credit card information on file with us unless you ask us to after this purchase is complete. Your rental will be available for 30 days. Once started, you'll have 72 hours to watch it as much as you'd like! You'll need an account to access this in our app. Please create a password to continue. You agree to our Terms Of Use.

Vikram Mahidhar reminds us all that AI is only as good as the humans supervising it and programming it. The biases and artefacts that come out of the processing are reflective of the biases programmed in at the beginning. A program trained to recognise totalled car bodies for insurance purposes, for example, will need close supervision of its decision-making outputs, for regulatory and consumer confidence and acceptance of the decision. There is a call and a growth in a new class of AI--one that is explainable, and that builds trust by providing evidence. Vikram also reminds us that a governance strategy is key to engendering trust in our organisation, processes and people.